On 6/28/2010 2:50 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 28/06/2010 20:31, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: >> I haven't tried it yet, still researching on which way to go (looked >> into Lustre, then glusterFS, then now this). Coincidentally, I just > > Not sure what you are trying to do here. Lustre, glusterfs, gfs etc > solve a different problem than imported remote storage ( which is > essentially what iscsi will give you ) I think he is looking for redundant, failover remote storage (i.e. mirrored copies from different iscsi hosts). Sort of like DRBD but with both copies remote. I think is should work but the timing might be tricky on retries vs. failure on the iscsi connections. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos