Re: clustered file system of choice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Jun 16, 2010, at 4:17 PM, "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 > wrote:

>> I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
>> data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
>> clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
>> Any recommendations?
>
> You haven't actually stated whether you want the backing devices  
> distributed
> or have the file system support more than one mount?
>
> You likely don't need a cluster aware fs, if you need to access the  
> data
> in more than one place any of several file sharing methodologies will
> work.
>
> I suspect as your storage need is large, you need to distribute it  
> across
> more than one block device probably on several servers? DRBD is of  
> no use
> here.

You are probably looking to have multiple iSCSI/FC storage servers/ 
appliances in the backend with one or more NAS head servers serving it  
up via NFS/CIFS.

If the head servers will be serving the same file systems  
simultaneously then you need a cluster file system and clustering  
software. If each head server will be serving a distinct file system  
then you probably just need some HA software like heartbeat or  
pacemaker to have those exports fail-over to the other head server(s)  
in the event of a head server failure.

-Ross

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux