On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:06:30PM +0000, Michael D. Berger wrote: > ls -lrt * > Is the precision of this only to the second? Yes. File timestamps are reported by the stat() call as time_t values, which are "seconds past 00:00:00 1/1/1970". So "ls" can only sort to a 1 second precision. -- rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: ls -lrt reversal
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: ls -lrt reversal
- From: Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:22:13 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <huoalm$l24$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
- References:
- ls -lrt reversal
- From: Michael D. Berger
- ls -lrt reversal
- Prev by Date: ls -lrt reversal
- Next by Date: Any experience with Eucalyptus on Centos 5.x?
- Previous by thread: ls -lrt reversal
- Next by thread: Any experience with Eucalyptus on Centos 5.x?
- Index(es):
 |