On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Robert Heller <heller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At Sat, 22 May 2010 16:49:49 -0400 CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Robert Heller <heller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > Note: this is *very* different from how Ubuntu (for example) is >> > numbered. Base Ubuntu 'version' numbers are just the year.month of the >> > release: Ubuntu 10.4 is just the base release of April of 2010, it is >> > NOT the 4th point release of the 10th major incarnation of Ubuntu. >> > Don't confuse this 'version numbering' with how CentOS's versions are >> > numbered. >> >> Correction: >> >> Ubuntu LTS versions do have point releases, probably swiped from RHEL/CentoOS. >> >> 8.04 was published at the end of April 2008 and has been updated to >> 8.04.1, 8.04.2, 8.04.3, 8.04.4 every subsequent July and January. > > Yes, but the *base version* '8.04' is NOT a point release. I stated > "Base Ubuntu 'version' numbers". I know about Ubuntu LTS versions. No comment... _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos