On 5/21/2010 10:56 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24:00AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> The only difference here 'should' be that explicitly running 'sh' will >> invoke your own shell aliases and search PATH to execute sh, where if >> you omit it you'll get the #!/bin/sh interpreter specified in the script >> itself. Is there anything in your aliases or anything before /bin in >> PATH where the working shell might be found? > > No aliases. No modification of PATH from the stock install. All other init.d > scripts are working without problem. But /bin isn't first in PATH. Does 'which sh' say /bin/sh? Also, sh and bash are really the same thing. Does rpm -V bash show everything stock? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos