Re: upgrading to a minor release 4.1 to 4.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 5/14/2010 12:56 PM, sheraz naz wrote:
> Thanks guys, this would work. FYI, as to "why", well it is a mission
> critical system that has been up and running for a while (on 4.1) but
> now we to update it to minimum 4.2 to meet some requirements, so we want
> to keep the changes to a minimum. As for security issues, the way it is
> setup currently that is not an issue, however it will be soon replaced
> with latest version of 5.x

You do know that changes within the minor-number updates are minimal 
anyway, don't you?  There have been a few notable exceptions in the 5.x 
line, but in general RHEL (and thus Centos) rarely has behavior or 
compatibility affecting changes in updates.  Unless you've already 
tested and found something unusual wrong with the up to date 4.x, I'd 
say you are taking most of the risk to update to something older (which 
almost by definition has known bugs) and not getting the benefit of 
having the known bugs fixed.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux