Re: mail server best practices question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



>-----Original Message-----
>If necessary I am willing to implement a new mail server and a new 
>backup mx.
>
>What I would like to know is what solution you guys would 
>recommend for 
>the mail server and the backup MX?
>
>Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
>

Running a backup or secondary MX at this point is largely a waste of
time. The only thing a backup MX gets you is an increase in spam.

Most MTAs will retry sending every couple of hours. So if your MX is
down for a while, it's not really a big issue.

I run a cluster of sendmail servers (at MX 0) with spamassassin and
clamav, and it works quite well. Provides redundnacy and scalability,
without the nonsense of a backup mx.

The last "backup" MX I ran was probably retired at least two years ago,
and even then it was well past pointless and irrelevant.

Cheers,

Dan
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux