Re: Not firewall, but what?

[Jussi Hirvi <listmember@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 9.5.2010 14.03, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> Okay, that makes my head hurt.  Why two VLANs?  What's you mapping
> between virtual interfaces and guests? And which guest is the bad one?

Ok, Kal, thank you for very useful ramblings!

This box is already in production, but I think the most useful approach 
here is to reconsider my setup.

I have two public networks here, 62.220.237.x and 62.236.221.x. I want 
to build a xen system, where some guests connect to one network, some 
guest to the other one, and some to both. To reduce cabling, I would 
like to do this with only two nics.

My solution now is two virtual bridges (I can post nearer details, if 
needes). And I have now landed into routing difficulties.

Are there some simpler or otherwise better approaches?

- Jussi

-- 
Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot
Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki * Finland
Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms)
jussi.hirvi@xxxxxxxxxxxx * http://www.greenspot.fi
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos