On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I would have to agree with the repo being misconfigured. If I'm on 5.4, > > and look for updates to 5.4, it should *not* tell me that one package > > needs updating, but that, and an unnoted dependency, are both actually > > 5.5. > > You do not look for updates on 5.4, but for updates on5. And EPEL (as > ATRPMS) tags along with RHEL - so you have to be looking out for > things like that when you use CentOS. Until now I have only seen the kernel causing problems (with kmdl support), and I have become very careful to always support the latest centos kernels (as well as centosplus kernels). Are there any other know issues with ATrpms and too early package support for the upcoming centos release? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpUireOTWROd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
