Re: Broken upgrade to memcached

[m.roth@xxxxxxxxx]

> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM,  <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I would have to agree with the repo being misconfigured. If I'm on 5.4,
>> and look for updates to 5.4, it should *not* tell me that one package
>> needs updating, but that, and an unnoted dependency, are both actually
>> 5.5.
>
> You do not look for updates on 5.4, but for updates on5. And EPEL (as
> ATRPMS) tags along with RHEL - so you have to be looking out for
> things like that when you use CentOS.
>
I believe I am looking for updates on 5. But, since 5.5 is *not* released,
I should not see bits and pieces that require it. What next, glibc?

        mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos