centOS vs "the upstream vendor"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi All;

I have a laptop running the "workstation" version of Linux from RedHat. I've 
enabled the EPEL and rpmfusion repos plus I'm subscribed to the following 
channels:
    *  Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 5 for 64-bit x86_64)
    * Red Hat Network Tools for RHEL Client (v.5 64-bit x86_64)
    * RHEL Desktop Supplementary (v. 5 for 64-bit x86_64)
    * RHEL Desktop Workstation FasTrack (v. 5 for 64-bit x86_64)
    * RHEL Desktop Workstation (v. 5 for 64-bit x86_64)
    * RHEL Desktop FasTrack (v. 5 for 64-bit x86_64)


I have openioffice version 3.1.1



I also have 2 employees running fully patched 5.4 CentOS. They also have the 
EPEL and rpmfusion repos enabled as well as the centos plus repo.  They 
however have openoffice version 2.3.0

I *thought* that CentOS was basically the equivelant of RHEL. did we do 
something wrong? or is RHEL (at least in the case of openoffice) shipping a 
newer release than CentOS?


Thanks in advance...

 
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux