Re: CentOS 5.x and Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




... and because some package is provided in the MAIN repository
does not mean its stable, either. I run amanda and have been doing
since 1998, the version that is in the main repository (2.5.0p2)
is 5 years old and crashed my 5.4 server (and another server I
look after part time voluntarily). I currently run a self compiled
2.6.1 and never looked back (this includes all of amanda's clients).

 
I don't think you understand how Red Hat (and thus CentOS) package
things.

The version of Amanda in RHEL 5.4 and CentOS 5.4 is indeed
2.5.0p2-8 (the -8 is important) and is not yet 6 months old, much
less 5 years old. When Red Hat packages RPMs, they often times
back port security patches and bugfixes.

As to why it crashed you server,  I can bet that there are other config
and software changes you have added "by hand" that may have caused
a problem. We have a few CentOS 5.4 systems running the standard
amanda packages without any problems.

Ian
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux