On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 14:29 +0100, lhecking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Here's a question: are you using your old configuration files? You might > > want to compare the default from the install with the old ones - there may > > be deprecated or defunct or invalid options. > > Have used the same smb.conf for years on RHEL3 while moving from 3.0.x to > 3.[2-4].x. > does testparm reveal any issues with the config? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: CentOS5 and samba
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: CentOS5 and samba
- From: Brian Sr <mail_list@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:54:10 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20100416132947.A9FD614F3F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: Mailing List Address
- References: <20100416130059.9601D14E22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8bd21430dde4cf97104edc762a7f5244.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100416132947.A9FD614F3F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CentOS5 and samba
- From: Chan Chung Hang Christopher
- Re: CentOS5 and samba
- References:
- CentOS5 and samba
- From: lhecking
- Re: CentOS5 and samba
- From: m . roth
- Re: CentOS5 and samba
- From: lhecking
- CentOS5 and samba
- Prev by Date: Samba and ldap failover - RH / Centos problem?
- Next by Date: Re: CentOS5 and samba
- Previous by thread: Re: CentOS5 and samba
- Next by thread: Re: CentOS5 and samba
- Index(es):
 |