<snip> > And so on. In the end, I decided not to bother and just left. > > :o) > > Niki Good move. Something would have broke after you were done and YOU would surely be the new blame scapegoat. "Everything was working great until HE was here"... _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Slightly OT: which hardware for CentOS file server (Samba, 2 To storage, 50 users)?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Slightly OT: which hardware for CentOS file server (Samba, 2 To storage, 50 users)?
- From: Scott Silva <ssilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:09:23 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4BC567E6.2000105@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4BC34213.6080509@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BC567E6.2000105@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: CentOS 5.x and Fedora
- Next by Date: Re: Building an "instant on" X terminal
- Previous by thread: Re: Slightly OT: which hardware for CentOS file server (Samba, 2 To storage, 50 users)?
- Next by thread: Re: Slightly OT: which hardware for CentOS file server (Samba, 2 To storage, 50 users)?
- Index(es):
 |