Anyone have an idea what the limitations put forth by 2003 would be?
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:12 PM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 4/8/2010 1:57 PM, David Lemcoe wrote:<snip>
>> Hello all. I'm in the process of making a small server farm based mostly
>> on Windows Server 2003. For simplicity's sake, the only non-2003 server
>> will be a CentOS 5.4 server running only vsftpd, httpd, and mysqld. My
>> plan is to have this server in a 2003 Server's network receiving a DHCP
>> address from the Domain Controller.
>> * *Machine 4* - CentOS 5.4 - On same network as other clients, hostsThe only thing I can think of on the Linux side are firewall rules.
>> web server.
>> o Does *NOT *receive DHCP address or DNS information.
>> o Has *no *internet access
>> o NAT does *NOT *forward correctly.
>>
>> I am looking for a solution to get the CentOS server on the network like
>> the other clients.
>
> Centos works normally with standard DHCP servers and obviously would
> know nothing about upstream NAT handling. There must be some sort of
> restriction imposed by the Windows server in this scenario.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
