Re: Release 6?

[Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 3/31/2010 4:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
>
> Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
> Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
> to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
> the same EL major release for more than 5 years. I mean, can you imagine
> anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than a year ago?

When something works right there's not much need to change it.  I still 
have an RH 7.3 box running that's had a couple of 4-year uptime spans 
(had to move it once).  And several Centos 3.x's.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos