Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
>
>
>> I mean, can you imagine anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than a
>> year ago?
>>
>
> Actually, I still have an RHEL 2.1 system in production. My excuse is that
> it is an Itanium I box (an HP I2000), and this is the latest version that
> will run on it. And it's working fine (but it is really slow). The bloody
> thing just won't die! It's going to have an accident, pretty soon, pretty
> soon.
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
Oooooops.... :D
But it's still nice to hear RHEL 2.1 is a resilient bastard - I guess
this is what really adds value to the enterprise product.
--
*Milos Blazevic*
Cert. No: 605008720421478
Email: milos.blazevic@xxxxxx <mailto:milos.blazevic@xxxxxx>
Tel: 064/301 45 78
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
