On Saturday 27 March 2010 05:07, John R Pierce wrote: > for all practical purposes its the same thing. if it was really > stripe then mirror, a naive mirror handler would think it would have to > remirror both drives when one half of one of the stripesets failed and > was replaced. but in fact, the mirror handlres tend to be well aware > of whats going on. mirror 0+1 aand stripe that with mirrored 2+3, > and its really all the same the native raid10 in newer mdraid is > cleaner because you don't end up with extra partial volume metadevices... Thank you kindly for your reply. -- Regards Robert Linux User #296285 http://counter.li.org _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: RAID 5 setup?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: RAID 5 setup?
- From: Robert Spangler <mlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:05:22 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4BADCAC6.7070708@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <777288381.6.1269545097098.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201003270117.05773.mlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BADCAC6.7070708@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: KMail/1.7.1
- References:
- RAID 5 setup?
- From: Slack-Moehrle
- Re: RAID 5 setup?
- From: Robert Spangler
- Re: RAID 5 setup?
- From: John R Pierce
- RAID 5 setup?
- Prev by Date: Re: RAID 5 setup?
- Next by Date: Re: RAID 5 setup?
- Previous by thread: Re: RAID 5 setup?
- Next by thread: Re: RAID 5 setup?
- Index(es):
 |