On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Paul Graydon <paulgraydon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've never found it particularly necessary to tune exim, out of the box
with a basic configuration it handles itself very well and scales nicely
even up to heavy loads. I've used it in 100k+ e-mails a day
environments without any stability or performance problems. It's a
rather popular mail server in the UK, possibly by nature of it's origins
at Cambridge.
I've not spent much time using postfix, but every time I have it's been
relatively straightforward and intuitive as well. Always seems to
perform well too :)
I rather feel its a bit of a case of 6 of one, half a dozen of the
other. Both tackle the same problem from slightly different angles, and
both have achieved excellence in their own ways.
There is a great introduction to configuring exim on this site:
http://www.exim-new-users.co.uk
Paul
_______________________________________________
Thanx guys, this is as much as I thought :) There's no real benefit in choosing one over the other, but rather use what I know.
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
