If it helps: we're running several 10-15TB filesystems with ReiserFS and never had even the slightest problem with it. The current limit, however, is 16TB even for ext4. Or, to be more precise: the filesystem could handle more than 16TB easily, however the tools necessary to create the filesystem (aka mkfs.ext4) have a hard-coded 32-bit limit that's been detected almost three years ago and has still not been fixed. Which should not affect your 2.7TB partition tho ;) Martin -- Rieke Computersysteme GmbH Hellerholz 5 D-82061 Neuried Email: martin@xxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: which FS is appropriate for a 2TB-sized partition?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: which FS is appropriate for a 2TB-sized partition?
- From: Martin Jungowski <martin@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:31:07 +0000 (UTC)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- References: <0D9BAD94-9666-4321-9F0E-AD7C841A23BA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3001B6CC-7E30-4D58-80AE-DCC63011E6B7@xxxxxxx> <FC2556A3-3994-4EB5-9423-F40B0430B51F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
- References:
- creating partitions on a 2.7TB drive
- From: Khusro Jaleel
- Re: creating partitions on a 2.7TB drive
- From: Tim Shubitz
- which FS is appropriate for a 2TB-sized partition?
- From: Khusro Jaleel
- creating partitions on a 2.7TB drive
- Prev by Date: Re: Motherboards for HPC applications
- Next by Date: Re: which FS is appropriate for a 2TB-sized partition?
- Previous by thread: Re: which FS is appropriate for a 2TB-sized partition?
- Next by thread: Re: which FS is appropriate for a 2TB-sized partition?
- Index(es):
 |