On 2/28/2010 6:15 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 02:37:13PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>> And how do I know all these mirror data mismatches are Swap? does not
>> each mismatch mean the mirrors disagree, which means one of them is
>> wrong. Which one? since they aren't timestamped or checksummed (like
>
> This thread is very timely. I updated my C5.3 to 5.4 last week (not
> sure why it took me so long) and this morning noticed my raid5 was
> resyncing. 5*1Tbyte disks. The resync took...
> Feb 28 04:22:02 mercury kernel: md: syncing RAID array md3
> Feb 28 16:27:06 mercury kernel: md: md3: sync done.
>
> Performance was bad during this time. Not terrible from an interactive
> point of view, but a job that normally run from 4am to 10am didn't finish
> until 3pm.
>
> I like the concept of checking the disks are good, but it really
> sounds like there are practical problems (false positives, performance
> degregation) .
>
> So I think /etc/sysconfig/raid-check is going to read
> ENABLED=no
I agree that is is a fairly surprising behavior change for an
'enterprise' system where the point is mostly to not have surprising
behavior changes. On the other hand it is probably a good thing to do
if you can make the scheduling fit in.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
