Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:06:11 -0600: > I'm not sure there is any reasonable way to understand the state of 3rd > party repositories. If there were, they'd probably fix their conflicts > and avoid them in the future... This wasn't what I referred to. He seemed to be unaware about how Centos "works". Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Backuppc-updates on CentOS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Backuppc-updates on CentOS
- From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:31:16 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4B869FF3.2050506@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <003b01cab5ff$27035c20$750a1460$@srbu@orgfarm.uu.se> <VA.00003a34.0505ca5a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <006501cab610$7ea5d690$7bf183b0$@srbu@orgfarm.uu.se> <VA.00003a35.05737790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B869FF3.2050506@xxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- Backuppc-updates on CentOS
- From: Sorin Srbu
- Re: Backuppc-updates on CentOS
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Re: Backuppc-updates on CentOS
- From: Sorin Srbu
- Re: Backuppc-updates on CentOS
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Re: Backuppc-updates on CentOS
- From: Les Mikesell
- Backuppc-updates on CentOS
- Prev by Date: Re: Backup solution to backup /var/spool/imap above 150GB data
- Next by Date: SMARTD (?)
- Previous by thread: Re: Backuppc-updates on CentOS
- Next by thread: Re: Backuppc-updates on CentOS
- Index(es):
 |