Am 17.02.2010 19:43, schrieb m.roth@xxxxxxxxx: > I'm finally biting the bullet, and replacing the 12-yr-old box that's been > my firewall/router with an appliance. First, does anyone have any idea > whether the WRT160 nl can use tomato? Second, is there any way, or any > reason, I could/would want to run bastille against the firmware? For tomato related stuff I'd check here: http://www.linksysinfo.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=160 Sadly my new router does not run it anymore because of builtin voip stuff. :( Rainer _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Linksys 160nl
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Linksys 160nl
- From: Rainer Traut <tr.ml@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:40:08 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <b9babb41ed2d8801d11dcf289cffb04e.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <b9babb41ed2d8801d11dcf289cffb04e.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; de; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
- References:
- Linksys 160nl
- From: m . roth
- Linksys 160nl
- Prev by Date: Re: how to push the bounds and get newer packages for centos 5.4?
- Next by Date: Re: best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?
- Previous by thread: Linksys 160nl
- Next by thread: CentOS 5.3 host not seeing storage device
- Index(es):
 |