Robert P. J. Day wrote on Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:16:09 -0500 (EST): > do i have a lot to worry about in terms > of mentally backing up one version? or is simply upgrading the centos > box to mysql 5.1 an option? I haven't seen any problems. I use the mysql 5.1 from the remy repo. I don't have it in heavy production, though. Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [OT?] diffs between mysql 5.0 and 5.1, and upgrading to mysql 5.1?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [OT?] diffs between mysql 5.0 and 5.1, and upgrading to mysql 5.1?
- From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:31:36 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002160506470.15434@localhost>
- References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002160506470.15434@localhost>
- References:
- [OT?] diffs between mysql 5.0 and 5.1, and upgrading to mysql 5.1?
- From: Robert P. J. Day
- [OT?] diffs between mysql 5.0 and 5.1, and upgrading to mysql 5.1?
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT?] diffs between mysql 5.0 and 5.1, and upgrading to mysql 5.1?
- Next by Date: is yum a complete substitute of rpm?
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT?] diffs between mysql 5.0 and 5.1, and upgrading to mysql 5.1?
- Next by thread: SAS raid controllers
- Index(es):
 |