Am 28.01.2010 12:28, schrieb Rudi Ahlers: > NOW, the question is: Which protocol would be best for this? I can only > think of SMB, NFS& iSCSI How about NFS v4? It only needs one port which you can tunnel through ssh. Rainer _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- From: Rainer Traut <tr.ml@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:00:07 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <695200da1001280328i5e9a48bficd085a44ea20fdda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <695200da1001280328i5e9a48bficd085a44ea20fdda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; de; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
- References:
- NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- From: Rudi Ahlers
- NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Prev by Date: Re: Browser related question
- Next by Date: Re: Installing an SSL Cert
- Previous by thread: Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next by thread: Crash during yum update
- Index(es):
 |