Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan <raju.rajsand@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greetings,

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOW, the question is: Which protocol would be best for this? I can only
> think of SMB, NFS & iSCSI


Just an innocent and possibly OOB suggestion  -- what you think of sshfs

Regards

Rajagopal
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

heh, I knew I should have mentioned it, but due to the extra kernel modules that it needs, it's a bit impractical for our XEN domU's. 

BUT, I also don't know what kind of performance gain it would give me, if any. Any experience with it?

--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux