Eero Volotinen wrote: > Sorry about a bit offtopic, but I am looking reliable (not free) > secondary dns provider. My company uses Dynect as primary and seconary though they can do secondary as well http://dyn.com/dynect We also use their DNS based global load balancing as well. So far 100% uptime(about 7-8 months of usage). Thousands of queries per second. nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: OT: reliable secondary dns provider
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: OT: reliable secondary dns provider
- From: "nate" <centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:28:35 -0800 (PST)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <385fe02c1001251321x5dc5889aw50fd02ed0a9e6d33@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <385fe02c1001251321x5dc5889aw50fd02ed0a9e6d33@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a
- References:
- OT: reliable secondary dns provider
- From: Eero Volotinen
- OT: reliable secondary dns provider
- Prev by Date: Re: Yum update failure (was a digest reference)
- Next by Date: Re: Yum update failure (was a digest reference)
- Previous by thread: OT: reliable secondary dns provider
- Next by thread: Re: OT: reliable secondary dns provider
- Index(es):
 |