Hi, > - A: one is with 80 GB SSD (and 12 GB memory) > http://www.ovh.co.uk/products/eg_ssd.xml > - B: the other with 750 GB SATA2 (and 8 GB memory). > http://www.ovh.co.uk/products/eg_best_of.xml The Intel SSD are fast but have a history of firmware problems. So I wouldn't suggest using them on a mission critical data. Personally I think asking for more RAM on the SATA server would do more for performance especially since you are going to be running several VM. Just my noobish 2 cents' worth. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Are SSD disks worth the cost for server usage?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Are SSD disks worth the cost for server usage?
- From: Noob Centos Admin <centos.admin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:13:38 +0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <ffbd93711001120430j20978777xad2059c49fd60c1e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <ffbd93711001120430j20978777xad2059c49fd60c1e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are SSD disks worth the cost for server usage?
- From: James Matthews
- Re: Are SSD disks worth the cost for server usage?
- References:
- Are SSD disks worth the cost for server usage?
- From: Mathieu Baudier
- Are SSD disks worth the cost for server usage?
- Prev by Date: yum install -y gcc?
- Next by Date: Re: unison versus rsync
- Previous by thread: Re: Are SSD disks worth the cost for server usage?
- Next by thread: Re: Are SSD disks worth the cost for server usage?
- Index(es):
 |