>-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf >Of Les Mikesell >Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:49 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: Backup server > >Between compression and pooling, I get about 10x the raw data being archived >with backuppc - it beats juggling tapes and you can let the users access the >backups of their own machine through a web interface. There are some down >sides >to plan around though: the compression takes some CPU and is slower than a >stock >rsync run, and the pooling is done with hardlinks which forces the archive to >be >on a single filesystem and makes it hard to duplicate for offsite copies. >There's an RPM in epel that is easy to install on Centos. Sound very interesting indeed! I don't think the performance will be a problem, the server's a calculation machine that has now been scrapped running a dual-xeon@2,something GHz and some 4GB RAM IIRC. Do you think the software-raid5 array used, would be a problem in this case? I've never had any problems with software raid5 in linux before, but you never know... -- /Sorin
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
