I'm using the same setup for multiple bridges for Xen, no problem. But I
use static IP addresses. You *have* to use IP numbers from different
subnets.
This hasn't fixed my issue. Perhaps it's because of the way I'm trying to use it (or I don't get it). Does each VM that is using a specific bridged device need to have the same IP subnet as that of the static brX address?
What I am trying to accomplish here is this:
Router (192.168.7.1) ---------> eth0/br0 (10.1.10.1) -------------> VM01 (with internal vr0 and vr1 attached to br0 and br1 and a bridged IP of 192.168.7.253, running Untangle in bridge mode)
VM01 --------> eth1/br1 -----------> local switch -------------> eth2/br2 --------------> other running VMs.
Thinking that the internal bridging done by the Untangle VM might have caused an issue... I setup just a stock Win Server 2003 install with a single ethernet device attached to br0 and set a static IP in the 192.168.7.X range (in Win 2k3 VM). The untangle VM is shutdown. I still can't ping 192.168.7.1 from the Win2k3 VM.
Thanks,
Jacob
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
