On Monday 11 January 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 01/08/2010 05:28 PM, R-Elists wrote: > > what is wrong or what problems are you referring to with cciss please ? > > problems mostly centered around management and performance issues. the > world is littered with stores of cciss fail I would certainly not go as far as saying that I like cciss, but, they are imho not much worse than other products. We currently have ~500T on p800 and it behaves quite well. As for the specifics: - Management: hpacucli is certainly odd, but then again neither tw_cli (3ware) nor cli64 (areca) shines. - Performance: certainly not a strong point, but a p800 can sustain quite a bit more than the 1G ethernet link I need. /Peter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
