Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> i zipped over to centos.org to check out the 5.4 manuals, and what i
>> found was:
>>
>> http://www.centos.org/docs/5/
>>
>> which stops at 5.2. now, i don't really see this as a problem since i
>> can always get what i need here:
>>
>> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/
>>
>> i'm just curious as to whether centos is just not bothering to rebrand
>> the manuals since it's just as easy to get that info from red hat.
>
> This was once asked in the CentOS-doc mailing list:
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2009-April/004279.html
>
> Couple of people offered help but no progress since. Maybe it is time
> to revisit the subject and get it going ?
>
Yes, someone has to add it to the "To Do" list.
In the meantime i've myself used and redirected people at
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/
*really* needed for updated documentation like the Virtualization one
(because of kvm since 5.4)
--
--
Fabian Arrotin
test -e /dev/human/brain || ( echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq ; echo c >
/proc/sysrq-trigger )
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
