So do you think incorrect zoning can lead to this?
Thanks
Paras.
-----------------------------------------------------
[root@prd1 ~]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 146.1 GB, 146163105792 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 17769 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 33 265041 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 34 4210 33551752+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda3 4211 6821 20972857+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda4 6822 17769 87939810 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 6822 17769 87939778+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdb: 323.4 GB, 323459481600 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39325 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 1 2 16033+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 3 39325 315861997+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdc: 359.3 GB, 359399424000 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 43694 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdc1 1 43694 350972023+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdd: 323.4 GB, 323459481600 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39325 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 1 2 16033+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdd2 3 39325 315861997+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sde: 323.4 GB, 323459481600 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39325 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sde1 1 2 16033+ 83 Linux
/dev/sde2 3 39325 315861997+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdf: 359.3 GB, 359399424000 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 43694 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdf1 1 43694 350972023+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdg: 323.4 GB, 323459481600 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39325 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdg1 1 2 16033+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdg2 3 39325 315861997+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdh: 323.4 GB, 323459481600 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39325 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdh1 1 2 16033+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdh2 3 39325 315861997+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdi: 359.3 GB, 359399424000 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 43694 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdi1 1 43694 350972023+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdj: 323.4 GB, 323459481600 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39325 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdj1 1 2 16033+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdj2 3 39325 315861997+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdk: 323.4 GB, 323459481600 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39325 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdk1 1 2 16033+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdk2 3 39325 315861997+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdl: 359.3 GB, 359399424000 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 43694 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdl1 1 43694 350972023+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdm: 323.4 GB, 323459481600 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39325 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdm1 1 2 16033+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdm2 3 39325 315861997+ 83 Linux
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@xxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/8/10 7:21 AM, Paras pradhan wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@xxxxxx
> <mailto:eero.volotinen@xxxxxx>> wrote:Are you sure that you can see correct luns? check the size ?
>
> On 1/8/10 6:38 AM, Paras pradhan wrote:
> > My CentOS 5.4 box has a single HBA card with 2 ports connected to my
> > Storage. 2 Luns are assigned to my HBA card. Under /dev instead of
> > seeing 4 devices I can see 12 devices from sdb to sdm. I am using
> qlogic
> > driver that is bulitin to the OS. Has any one seen this kind of
> situation?
>
> Sounds like zoning problem ..
>
>
> Storage is HDS and the LUN type created was of type netware. I don't
> know why this type but my storage administrator said its correct. This
> might be an issue?
>
> Or if you can ellaborate how this is zoning problem it wud be great help.
--
Eero
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
