Re: stock openjdk vs. epel

[John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Les Mikesell wrote:
> Given that it could have been trivial to include Sun Java ages ago, or at least 
> not intentionally break the jpackage installation methods, I think Red Hat has 
> done more damage to java than any other company and don't see that turning 
> around even if they try at this late date.
>   

no, it wasn't trivial due to primarily licensing reasons.  
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos