Kwan Lowe wrote: >>> With LVMs you'd of course lose the flexibility of file-backed targets >>> and the ability to do sparse files are you're intending.. >>> >>> dd if=/dev/zero of=iqn.2009-12.com.mydomain:storage.disk01.foo.foo >>> bs=1 count=0 seek=16G >> LVM was my first option and performance it is very very good with iSCSI, but backup >> and restore it is a problem with LVM. For these reason I need to use large files on >> this server... > > I actually prefer backing up LVMs.. I use the snapshot feature which > means I can backup a live volume. Works well. But I can't use snapshot feature because under these lvm partitions there are ZFS, NTFS and so on filesystems that linux can't access ... -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos