Alan McKay wrote: > Hey folks, > > Is there any way to get this to report the proper values again? > The disk did fill up but we removed a good 60G of data but it still shows > full > Is/was the data you removed still in use? Run lsof and grep for "deleted", if you get a bunch of hits you have to stop/kill those processes for the space to be freed. Otherwise perhaps a fsck is in order. nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: disk at 101% - but it isn't
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: disk at 101% - but it isn't
- From: "nate" <centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:34:00 -0800 (PST)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <844129e80912210929x719e2181ud94c6c28eebcdae7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <844129e80912210929x719e2181ud94c6c28eebcdae7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a
- References:
- disk at 101% - but it isn't
- From: Alan McKay
- disk at 101% - but it isn't
- Prev by Date: disk at 101% - but it isn't
- Next by Date: What determines default kernel after update?
- Previous by thread: disk at 101% - but it isn't
- Next by thread: What determines default kernel after update?
- Index(es):
 |