Re: [OT] Urgent request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:22:58PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> 
> how do you know this is the problem, and the motherboard hasn't croaked 
> in some OTHER 10+ year old crusty mobo fashion ?

	Because the original poster specifically stated that the 
	box had failed video ram in it? :)  While possible that there
	are other issues at play, I can only go by the information
	provided by the orignal poster.

	I've never seen a motherboard from that era that could bypass
	failed video memory POST results - YMMV.




							John

-- 
"Thinking implies disagreement; and disagreement implies non-comformity; and
non-comformity implies heresy; and heresy implies disloyality -- so obviously
thinking must be stopped"
[Call to Greatness, 1954] -- Adlai Stephenson

Attachment: pgpekyu31fy6a.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux