Re: Firewall for virtual machines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



John Doe wrote:
> From: mark <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx>
>   
>> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>>     
>>> Mhr wrote on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:50:27 -0800:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> would it be a bad idea (or a complete waste)
>>>> to use a firewall, like ZoneAlarm, on my Windows guest OS?
>>>>         
>>> Yes, using ZA is a bad idea. XP has its own firewall which is enabled by 
>>> default if you are patched up-to-date. Keep that on.
>>>       
>> Huh? I've *NEVER* heard great things about WinDoze firewall, and the std. from 
>> the fairly heavy duty folks I know who support WinDoze is that the std for 
>> non-commercial is ZoneAlarm.
>>     
>
> Personaly, I use ZoneAlarm 'mainly' for the outbound blocking.
> I like to know (and allow/disalow) when an application tries to phone home...
>
> JD
>   
Personally, I have had Zone Alarm mess up it's ACL a few times and block 
applications in it's allow list. I normally firewall else where & use 
Windows Firewall for internal stuff, the Windows Firewall in Windows7 
supports an ACL for inbound and outbound rules.

HTH

-- 
IT Support Bristol & Computer Support Bristol

http://www.netzensolutions.com

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux