Re: Firewall for virtual machines

[MHR <mhullrich@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mhr wrote on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:50:27 -0800:
>
> Yes, using ZA is a bad idea. XP has its own firewall which is enabled by
> default if you are patched up-to-date. Keep that on.
>

Now you've sparked my curiosity - how is the XP firewall any better than ZA?

Also, in regard to other answers I've seen on the list, since I'm
using NAT, isn't another firewall just a waste?

Thanks.

mhr
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos