Re: XFS and LVM2 (possibly in the scenario of snapshots)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> LVM like md raid and drbd is a layered block device and
> If you turn the wire caches off on the HDs then there is no problem,
> but HDs aren't designed to perform to spec with the write cache
> disabled they expect important data is written with FUA access (forced
> unit access), so performance will be terrible.

I hope that I'm not going too much off topic here, but I'm getting
worried not to be sure to understand, especially when it has to do
with data safety:

Considering a stack of:
- ext3
- on top of LVM2
- on top of software RAID1
- on top of regular SATA disks (no hardware RAID)
is it "safe" to have the HD cache enabled?

(Note: ext3, not XFS, hence the possible off-topic...)

In other words, is this discussion about barriers, etc. only relevant to XFS?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux