On 12/07/2009 05:09 AM, Jon Moore wrote: >> The following lines are in /etc/hosts >> 192.168.11.1 dev.example.com >> 192.168.11.1 dev1.example.com >> >> Pinging any other address that I try works, except dev.example.com. >> > > try having both host names on the same line. Thanks, but this did not help. I had tried many, many things before posting. I tried this to be sure, but no help. -- Sincerely, John Thomas _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Name Resolution Broken for One Address
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Name Resolution Broken for One Address
- From: John Thomas <gmane-2006-04-16@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:17:37 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <365a7e3b0912070509w423338cg6c317e81bace28b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4B1CFC14.8080202@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <365a7e3b0912070509w423338cg6c317e81bace28b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090625 CentOS/2.0.0.22-2.el5.centos Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Name Resolution Broken for One Address
- From: Arturas Skauronas
- Re: Name Resolution Broken for One Address
- References:
- Name Resolution Broken for One Address
- From: John Thomas
- Re: Name Resolution Broken for One Address
- From: Jon Moore
- Name Resolution Broken for One Address
- Prev by Date: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
- Next by Date: Re: Name Resolution Broken for One Address
- Previous by thread: Re: Name Resolution Broken for One Address
- Next by thread: Re: Name Resolution Broken for One Address
- Index(es):
 |