> For enterprise environments my favorite FS is XFS, YMMV, though. > I also thought about using xfs, but I don't like the idea of it being dependent of an external kernel module that is always lagging behind the current kernel version. RedHat made the very questionable decision of NOT including the xfs module in the 32 bit flavor of RHEL 5.4... _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Is ext4 safe for a production server?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- From: Miguel Medalha <miguelmedalha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:27:47 +0000
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4B1A8300.1040303@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4B1A7A3E.10205@xxxxxxx> <4B1A7EEE.10506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B1A8300.1040303@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- From: Akemi Yagi
- Re: Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- From: Timo Schoeler
- Re: Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- References:
- Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- From: Miguel Medalha
- Re: Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- From: Chan Chung Hang Christopher
- Re: Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- From: Timo Schoeler
- Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- Next by Date: Re: Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- Next by thread: Re: Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- Index(es):
 |