Re: non-threaded perl no longer in .spec file

[m.roth@xxxxxxxxx]

> At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:43 -0500 CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
<snip>
>> Is there something "bad" about the non-threading variant?
>
> Probably the same thing that is bad about a single core processor.
> Which are pretty much no longer available (except for processors meant
> for little SBC/Embedded systems).  I suspect that either RH or (more

I'll call you on that. A *lot* of people, both at home and in offices, are
running single core systems, and will be for years. Most folks can't
afford to upgrade every year or two... and since *most* folks are running
office software, browsing the Web, and doing email, don't *need* to.

Besides, this *is* Linux we're talking about, which runs on *everything*,
including 386's....

          mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos