David McGuffey wrote: > Seems to me that any IDS must be tied to the yum update process so that > one is not dealing with hundreds/thousands of changes that were brought > in by a yum update that I choose to apply. > > Is OSSEC any less noisy? > Nope. -Alan _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: AIDE or OSSEC on CentOS 5.4 x86_64?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: AIDE or OSSEC on CentOS 5.4 x86_64?
- From: Alan Sparks <asparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:09:55 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1259452642.6004.33.camel@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1259452642.6004.33.camel@xxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
- References:
- AIDE or OSSEC on CentOS 5.4 x86_64?
- From: David McGuffey
- AIDE or OSSEC on CentOS 5.4 x86_64?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fedora 11 i386 Evolution address book --> CentOS 5.4 x86_64
- Next by Date: Re: again, nic driver order
- Previous by thread: AIDE or OSSEC on CentOS 5.4 x86_64?
- Next by thread: Re: AIDE or OSSEC on CentOS 5.4 x86_64?
- Index(es):
 |