Re: again, nic driver order

[Tom H <tomh0665@xxxxxxxxx>]

>> Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and
>> fingers crossed, they seem to work!

>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8", NAME="eth0"  # pro/1000gt
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:e0:81:b5:7a:30", NAME="eth1"  # internal 1
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:e0:81:b5:7a:31", NAME="eth2"  # internal 2

> It turns out it was just a fluke the server booted up with the correct
> order.  Another reboot and the nic's are all screwed up again, the
> built in and external card sharing eth0, the second built in as eth1.

> On the second server, things are the same even with the new rules, nic
> drvier order is seemingly chosen at random with each boot.

Do you have anything else in 60-net.rules other than these three rules?

Try prepending "KERNEL=="eth*, "" and/or "ACTION=="add, "".
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos