Re: SAMBA vs NFS

[Rainer Duffner <rainer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Keith Keller schrieb:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:14:56AM -0700, Craig White wrote:
>   
>> NFS mounts for Linux users
>> Samba for Windows users
>> Netatalk for Macintosh clients
>>     
>
> Wow, I didn't even know netatalk was still around!  How does it compare
> to SMB on OS X clients?  I'm thinking that, unless you have a pressing
> need for some particular netatalk option, that using Samba for those
> clients as well simplifies admin on the backend.  IOW, what are the
> scenarios where netatalk is either strongly preferred or required over
> Samba?
>
>   

My guess would be: Macs with OS 9 or older ;-)
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos