Hallo
I submitted this as
a bug several weeks ago, but I wanted to ask around & see if anyone else has
come across this....
The disk is labeled as GPT, and formatted as a 2.8 TB ext3 partition (this issue also happens with xfs). I used a gparted boot disk to create the partition.
When I attach the drive I see this in messages:
Nov 2 14:26:55 kernel: usb 1-5.2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 7
Nov 2 14:26:56 kernel: usb 1-5.2: configuration 0000001 chosen from 1 choice
Nov 2 14:26:56 kernel: scsi5 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
Nov 2 14:26:56 kernel: usb-storage: device found at 7
Nov 2 14:26:56 kernel: usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
Nov 2 14:27:01 kernel: Vendor: BUFFALO Model: HD-QSSU2/R5 1 Rev: 2.02
Nov 2 14:27:01 kernel: Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05
Nov 2 14:27:01 kernel: sdc : very big device. try to use READ CAPACITY(16).
Nov 2 14:27:01 kernel: sdc : READ CAPACITY(16) failed.
Nov 2 14:27:01 kernel: sdc : status=0, message=00, host=5, driver=00
Nov 2 14:27:01 kernel: sdc : use 0xffffffff as device size
Nov 2 14:27:01 kernel: SCSI device sdc: 4294967296 512-byte hdwr sectors (2199023 MB)
Nov 2 14:27:01 kernel: sdc: Write Protect is off
After this failure, the disk is either a) inaccessible, or b) reports only a 2 TB partition.
The latest Ubuntu can read the disk, presenting the full 2.8 TB just peachy.
This server is up to date:
uname -a: Linux
myserver.mydomain.com 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 3 16:18:27 EST 2009 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
cat /etc/redhat-release: CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
[root@myserver ~]# cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name
...
8 32 2147483648 sdc << the disk showing incorrectly with only 2TB of storage
cat /etc/redhat-release: CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
[root@myserver ~]# cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name
...
8 32 2147483648 sdc << the disk showing incorrectly with only 2TB of storage
This bug seems very
similar to a previous bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502944
which was reported fixed in 5.4
Anyone seen
this before, or have any ideas how I can get CentOS to see the
disk?
Cheers,
Gareth
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos