On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 07:09 -0500, Steve Huff wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:43 PM, David McGuffey wrote:
>
> >> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> >> gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.8-3.el5.rf.x86_64 from rpmforge has
> >> depsolving problems
> >> --> Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
> >> gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.8-3.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
> >> libquicktime-1.1.3-1.el5.rf.x86_64 from rpmforge has depsolving
> >> problems
> >> --> Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
> >> libquicktime-1.1.3-1.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
> >> Error: Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
> >> libquicktime-1.1.3-1.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
> >> Error: Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
> >> gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.8-3.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
> >> You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> >> You could try running: package-cleanup --problems
> >> package-cleanup --dupes
> >> rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> >> The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils package.
> >> [root@desk Desktop]#
> >>
> >> First question: Is the guidance for multimedia accurate for an 5.4
> >> x86_64 load?
> >>
> >> Second question: is rpmforge fully ready for 5.4?
>
> this is a known issue; Dag has been working on fixing it over the
> weekend:
>
> http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2009-November/002797.html
>
> > So...are the gstreamer-plugins in rpmforge ready for 5.4?
>
>
> i was just able to install gstreamer-plugins-bad on a 5.4 i386 host.
>
> -steve
I'm running 5.4 x86_64, so maybe I'll have to wait for the rpmforge to
catch up.
DaveM
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
