Spacewalk or Puppet?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

>> Were you around back in the late 90s when redhat shipped a 
>> broken gcc? :) Even today redhat seems to have the biggest 
>> mind share and perhaps

> That was 2.96, I think?

or perhaps you refer to egcs, which was an earlier effort to 
poke a stick in the lagging FSF effort

not to troll here, but the argument may be made that the 2.96 
demoninated gcc variant was more stable (less 'broken') than 
its upstream at like level.  Bero is long gone from Red Hat of 
course, but I have an archival copy of his statement here:
 	http://www.owlriver.com/tips/gcc-296-bero/

May we have a new Subject on this drifted thread if it 
continues, please?

-- Russ herrold
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux