Hi, On 04/11/09 22:53, Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote: > REE seems the obvious candidate - unless other folk can recommend an > alternative. ruby-ee is a patched 1.8.6 - so the stock spec builds and works fine, you just need to rebuild everything around it, specially if you intend to replace the system ruby! - KB _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Ruby Enterprise Edition
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Ruby Enterprise Edition
- From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:00:19 +0000
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <95447afd0911041453p661ae3e3n4e8a7fedd922d6f1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <95447afd0911041453p661ae3e3n4e8a7fedd922d6f1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.5pre) Gecko/20091026 Shredder/3.0pre
- References:
- Ruby Enterprise Edition
- From: Stephen Nelson-Smith
- Ruby Enterprise Edition
- Prev by Date: Re: user management solution needed
- Next by Date: Re: Spacewalk or Puppet?
- Previous by thread: Re: Ruby Enterprise Edition
- Next by thread: Re: [Samba] Accessing Windows file-system from Linux samba server
- Index(es):
 |